The exposure of Mr. Zhang’s faked credentials provoked a fresh round of hand-wringing over what many scholars and Chinese complain are the dishonest practices that permeate society, including students who cheat on college entrance exams, scholars who promote fake or unoriginal research, and dairy companies that sell poisoned milk to infants. ...

Few countries are immune to high-profile frauds. Illegal doping in sports and malfeasance on Wall Street are running scandals in the United States. But in China, fakery in one area in particular — education and scientific research — is pervasive enough that many here worry it could make it harder for the country to climb the next rung on the economic ladder.
- ANDREW JACOBS, Rampant Fraud Threat to China’s Brisk Ascent, NYT, October 6, 2010

Now, a recent string of high-profile scandals over questionable or discredited research has driven home the point in China that to become a scientific superpower, it must first overcome a festering problem of systemic fraud. ...
In April, a scientific journal retracted 107 biology research papers, the vast majority of them written by Chinese authors, after evidence emerged that they had faked glowing reviews of their articles. Then, this summer, a Chinese gene scientist who had won celebrity status for breakthroughs once trumpeted as Nobel Prize-worthy was forced to retract his research when other scientists failed to replicate his results.
At the same time, a government investigation highlighted the existence of a thriving online black market that sells everything from positive peer reviews to entire research articles.
- AMY QIN, Fraud Scandals Sap China’s Dream of Becoming a Science Superpower, NYT, OCT. 13, 2017

The problems didn’t end there. As Stephanie Lee at BuzzFeed recently reported, it appears that the study wasn’t conducted on 8-to-11-year-olds as published. It was done on 3-to-5-year-olds.
- Aaron E. Carroll, The Cookie Crumbles: A Retracted Study Points to a Larger Truth, NYT, OCT. 23, 2017

Another Steven Holl project that is so conceptually out there that it forgot there might be human beings involved some day. It amazes me that Holl continues to receive both high praise and cream commissions. I’ll never forget the narrative of his disastrous MIT dorm project. It was all about “porosity”, an intellectual dodge aimed at justifying a truly hideous gridded behemoth. My profession is littered with phony builder-poets who get away with these scams due to their deep ties to academia, and the circular back-slapping of the published elite.
- Mags, Connecticut, 11/5/2019, Comment on Sharon Otterman, New Library Is a $41.5 Million Masterpiece. But About Those Stairs., NYT, Nov. 5, 2019
( For a view of the MIT dorm, known as the Sponge, see https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Simmons_Hall%2C_MIT%2C_Cambridge%2C_Massachusetts.JPG.
CT 11/5/19
@Mags.   Well, Simmons Hall at MIT is pretty distinctive, but the often air-headed architectural community tend to praise novelty over function. Heck there’s even a Gehry nightmare at the other end of the campus, and adventurousness in architecture has long been a feature of this campus. That said, and speaking as an alum, most Tech students would be perfectly at ease in subterranean metal cages along the lines of sub-par prison cells, as long as the telecom was solid and nobody cared if you defaced things. The Metal Sponge, as it is affectionally known, has a ball pit, and for hundreds perched at different places on The Spectrum, a ball pit is a really good thing. [ibid];
http://simmons.mit.edu/inthesponge; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF6hUza_sEs )

See also:

Fake Academe

Show php error messages